top of page
Comments (4)

Adeline Yong
Adeline Yong
Nov 11, 2023

Hi Jia Wei, your blog was eye-opening! I had no idea about these fascinating birds until I came across your blog. Thanks for sharing your findings, they were very informative. As mentioned in your blog, shoebill is listed as 'vulnerable' by the IUCN red list. I would like to ask what are the reasons leading to the endangering of shoebill?

Thank you.



Like
Jia Wei
Jia Wei
Admin
Nov 11, 2023
Replying to

Hi Adeline, thanks for engaging with my blog and for your question. To answer your question, the endangerment of shoebill stork is primarily due to habitat or breeding ground loss driven by wetland destruction, alongside hunting and illegal trade for their unique appearance and alleged medicinal value, while within their population, the largest and strongest chicks in the hatch often engage in fratricide (kiling their own siblings), which impacts their overall numbers as only one chick survive.



Edited
Like

Alex Chia Qing Yi
Alex Chia Qing Yi
Nov 09, 2023

Hi Jia Wei, the shoebill's reclassification and evolutionary theories are intriguing! Given its unique evolution and shared physical traits with other species, what practical implications does this reclassification have for our understanding of shoebill biology and conservation efforts?

Like
Jia Wei
Jia Wei
Admin
Nov 11, 2023
Replying to

Hi Alex, great question! Thanks for asking. The reclassification of shoebills within the Pelecaniformes order indeed holds practical implications for our understanding of shoebill biology. For instance, one key shared feature between Pelecaniformes and shoebills- the fusion of the furcula with the apex carinae of the sternum has shed light on shoebill’s biology. According to Guttman (1999), the depth of the keel on a bird's sternum is often linked to their flight power, with flightless birds such as ostriches lacking this keel. In the case of shoebills and other less proficient fliers within the Pelecaniformes order, the fusion of the furcula and sternum creates a small keel, as highlighted by Kaiser (2011). This unique adaptation provides structural support during their distinctive crash-foraging behaviours—shoebills plunging into dense mats of vegetation in the wetlands and Pelecaniformes diving into water to hunt. This reinforcement helps shoebills withstand the impact when they plunge into dense mats of vegetation, as discussed by Cracraft (1981). This shared physical trait reveals the specialized adaptations that enable shoebills to engage in their unique foraging behaviours, offering valuable insights into their biology.


Next, regarding to the conservation efforts, unfortunately, there's a scarcity of studies supporting a direct link between reclassification of shoebills within the Pelecaniformes order and the conservation efforts of shoebills. Current studies posited that the decline in shoebill population primarily stems from habitat loss, deforestation, hunting, and also their fratricide nature. In response, ongoing conservation endeavours focus on initiatives like nest protection and captive breeding programs to help restore shoebill populations. Your suggestion of leveraging the study of shoebill reclassification and shared physical traits as the means to inform conservation strategies is promising. Yet, the current body of research remains limited in understanding these aspects of shoebill biology. As such, there's a pressing need for further studies, considering that the shoebill continues to be relatively understudied. More comprehensive research in this direction could significantly enhance our ability to tailor conservation efforts effectively to the specific needs and behaviours of shoebills. I hope this addresses your question. Thank you for raising this important point.


(References)

  1. Kaiser, G 2011, ‘15 Functional and Phylogenetic Diversity in Marine and Aquatic Birds’, Living Dinosaurs: The Evolutionary History of Modern Birds, p.355.

  2. Cracraft, J 1981, ‘Toward a phylogenetic classification of the recent birds of the world (Class Aves)’, The Auk, vol. 98, no. 4, pp.681-714.

  3. Guttman B. Biology. McGraw-Hill Companies USA. 1999. p.5-6.




Edited
Like
bottom of page